Should the Alcoholic Drinking Age be Increased Essay

Why the Alcoholic Drinking Age Should Be Decreased? The general idea behind the raising of alcoholic drinking age is that it protects young people who are still incapable of accepting responsibilities, from the abuse of alcohol. It is, however, very doubtful whether it performs this function. The matter is, the more something is prohibited, the more appealing it looks for those who are prohibited to do it. A person who would have been drinking from time to time, if he were allowed to, will be drinking immoderately and in secret if he is forbidden to do it, for the simple reason of it being cool. Moreover, with the minimum alcohol drinking age being 21 years, the situation looks especially ridiculous. At 18 people are considered to be mature enough to take responsibilities, get married, vote, sign contracts and be persecuted by law if they break it; but officially they still are not allowed to drink until they turn 21. It would be naive to suppose that restriction laws like this can protect somebody from something. Young people may be prevented from drinking in bars, but who will stop them from drinking in all kinds of places and situations when drinks become available? If a person doesn’t treat alcohol as something overly exciting, mysterious and unattainable, he will most likely treat it as just yet another aspect of life, which is capable of being fun but nothing more. If he is prohibited from drinking it is more than probable that he will plunge into drinking once he is allowed to. And yes, doesn’t history teach us anything? The Prohibition in the early 20th century was supposed to eliminate alcohol abuse altogether; instead, government enforcement brought what it usually brings: great waste of money, emergence of great crime families without lowering the quantity of consumed alcohol at all.

Cute Cupcakes One Must See ! - 1016 Words

Cute cupcakes one must see! Cupcakes have become a household name and most of us love to have it, anybody who has got a sweet tooth can’t live without these cute little cupcakes. For someone like me I can’t imagine an evening without tea and my favourite cupcake. That’s how the bond is. Without a doubt, it’s a delicacy gifted to us by English, and like most of the English stuff we fell head over heels with these tiny little bundle of joy. These days they accompany us at every event, parties and even in our bad phase. Who does not want to have that little sugar rush after a bad day at work, or post break up ,or a birthday , weddings , get together etc. cupcakes have been there with us in all our thick and thin. Don’t you think these are the reasons enough to love them and indulge in them every once in a while. First of the cupcakes were made in as early as 1796. But they gained popularity in nineteenth century. Also known as fairy cakes or patty cakes, they can be baked in small and thin butter paper or aluminium foil. The major ingredients are butter, sugar, eggs and flour. Any recipe, which can be used to bake a layer cake, can be used to create the cupcakes. One can also use flavoured batter for baking the cupcakes, mixed with raisin, nuts, berries, chocolate chips etc. Because of their tiny size, they are really easy to bake. One can also top these with frosting and decorate them with fruits, dry fruits or cream. There are number of variety of cupcakes like cake in a mugShow MoreRelatedBaked by Melissa7985 Words   |  32 PagesVillacorta I. Executive Summary The Cupcake and cupcake bakery business is one of the fastest growing industries in America with New York as the â€Å"cupcake capital†. Cupcake bakeries are recession-proof, was fueled by the 1 recession and, according to the Wall Street Journal , they‟re contributing more jobs to the labor 2 market than the restaurant industry. Known as the â€Å"Magnolia Effect† , cupcakes have come a long way with the latest micro trend being mini-cupcakes – culminating with the coming togetherRead MoreMarketing Management 14th Edition Test Bank Kotler Test Bank173911 Words   |  696 Pagesstandardized. B) It can help create jobs in the economy by increasing demand for goods and services. C) It helps to build a loyal customer base but has no impact on a firms intangible assets. D) It is more important for bigger organizations than smaller ones. E) It is seldom used by nonprofit organizations. Answer: B Page Ref: 4 Objective: 1 Difficulty: Easy 2) ________ is the art and science of choosing target markets and getting, keeping, and growing customers through creating, delivering

Compare And Contrast Of The Me Essay Example For Students

Compare And Contrast Of The Me Essay Compare and Contrast of The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka and The Stranger by Albert CamusExistentialism is defined as a philosophical movement that human beings are completely free and responsible for their own actions. Existentialists will try not to cause waves and remain completely uninvolved with anyone because they do not want to hurt anybody. There is absolutely no such thing as an existentialist because he would have to be so uninvolved to the point where he would not be able to live at all. Although the two stories: The Metamorphosis by Franz Kafka and The Stranger by Albert Camus are very different in approach, their endings are similar in that they both support the basics of existentialism. The biggest difference between the two characters: Gregor and Mersault is their physical form. One has changed physically into a giant insect while the other remains a normal human being. Another difference is the situation between the characters and their mothers. Gregor wants to have a relationship with his mother but cannot because of his physical form. Mersaults mother is alive and well for part of the novel, but he does not want to take care of her or have anything to do with her. The two characters are similar in the way that they do not believe in God and will both die lonely and abandoned. Kafka creates a very lonely and abandoned world for Gregor Samsa in his short novel Metamorphosis. Gregor is an existentialist character who mutates into a giant bug without reason and no longer has any control over his life. He becomes completely uninvolved in the way that he does not talk or have any interaction with anyone inside or outside of the family. He is dehumanized. Gregors mother is disgusted by the looks of him and refuses to see or talk to him. Gregor is now lonely and abandoned by his family, does not eat and eventually dies. In the short novel The Stranger, Mersault is also an existentialistic character. He does not wish to become involved with anyone, including God and his own mother and does not have any emotion what so-ever when she dies. Although Mersault does not want to become involved with anyone, he also does not want to create waves, thus he cannot help but to say yes to a friend when he asks him for help. He becomes susceptible to the physical. Mersault takes responsibility for his actions by being executed after he commits murder.Both the stories endings support the basics of existentialism by demonstrating the following rules: responsibilities, loneliness, abandonment, no control, do not cause waves and the act of being uninvolved. Gregor and Mersault demonstrate all of these characteristics; however they do cause waves. As a result of Gregors metamorphosis his entire family must change their lives and Mersault creates waves by committing murder. Unfortunately, whether it be because of their existentialistic characteristics or not, they die.

Is Lord of the Flies a Searching Examination of Human Nature Essay Example

Is Lord of the Flies a Searching Examination of Human Nature? Paper Is ‘Lord of the Flies’ a searching examination of human nature? â€Å"Weve got to have rules and obey them. After all, were not savages. Were English, and the English are best at everything. † These are lines taken from chapter 2 of the novel ‘Lord of the Flies’. To show the change in the character and the situation through the novel here is another quote from the last chapter of the novel, â€Å"I should have thought,† said the officer as he visualized the search before him, â€Å"I should have thought that a pack of British boys you’re all British aren’t you? would have been able to put up a better show than that I mean†. The novel shows itself to be a lot of things, a comment on war, an adventure novel or a statement of character. Through the book Golding attempts to not only warn us about the consequences of another war, but also enables us to view an array of different personalities and people profiles. Yes, ‘Lo rd of the Flies’ is a searching examination of human nature, where from the reader not only gets an authorial opinion on various types of people but also get to, for themselves, form an image of the individualities of each and every character. The arguable protagonist of the novel is Ralph, a rational and democratic leader who is somewhat obsessed with the fire. In the start of the novel he too is indifferent towards the easy target Piggy, but slowly learns to respect him. It is Ralph who initially keeps the boys focused on their goal of being rescued, but as his mind gets clouded so does his objective. Golding shows Ralph to be the civilised man, an evolved creature who conforms to society but still has his flaws. Ralph shows his flaws when he continues to disregard Piggy’s asthma by saying, â€Å"Sucks to your as-mar! whenever the topic is broached. He also shows poor judgement when he gives into his primitive instincts and participates in the killing of Simon. Ralph to the reader symbolises the leader who is civilised and dedicated but can often slip-up and make mistakes. His relatable reactions and simple solutions represent a man of will, who is defeated by circumstance. He wants to let the fire continue but h as too little manpower to do so, but still persists on finding a solution the next day. We also see him to be delusional at times, like when the curtain flickers in his brain and he is unable to think. We will write a custom essay sample on Is Lord of the Flies a Searching Examination of Human Nature? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Is Lord of the Flies a Searching Examination of Human Nature? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Is Lord of the Flies a Searching Examination of Human Nature? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer His biggest moment of what can be called stupidity is when he says, â€Å"Supposing we go, looking like we used to, washed and hair brushed after all we aren’t savages really and being rescued isn’t a game†. He believes that despite the savagery that has spread through Jack and this tribe they will listen to him if he takes a shower, it is possibly his biggest moment of failure. Through the same instance we see another trait of human nature in him which is desperation. Ralph is trying to cling on to any little form of order and hope that he can muster. He hopes to win the other boys over with his endeavour to appeal to the little remnants of civilisation. Another striking event that stands out with respect to Ralph is when he slaughters â€Å"the beast†, he is the one trying to establish decorum and it is he who destroys the reason for chaos. To contrasts Ralph as the civilised human being Golding creates Jack, the adversary. Ironically a choir boy, Jack slowly turns out to be tyrannical dictator and comes to represent the evil or the ruthless side of human nature. At first, Jack goes along with Ralph and allows himself to be appeased as the head of the hunters. He is content with his position and desperately tries to gather meat. His first attempt at killing the animal is disastrous not due to lack of skill, but because he still has some conscience left in him and is actually scared of committing the murder. He also says that while he hunts he feels like he is â€Å"being hunted†. This shows the last fragments of humanity left in him. He turns into an almost repulsive animal at the end of the novel. Golding shows man’s primitive instincts in Jack, his need for food, power and blood. We often wonder from where the deep seethed blackness appears in Jack. I can only speculate that the intensive education provided to him in the church results in a catastrophic rebellion where Jack loses all sense of sanity and conforms to the baser human. Towards the end of the novel Jack is adhered to as the chief and everyone on the island fears him. He hates Piggy from the very beginning and is fearful of his intelligence. He knows that Piggy’s rationality could be responsible for his downfall and could harm his dictatorship. He is envious of his superiority. â€Å"His tone conveyed a warning, given out of the pride of ownership, and the boys ate faster while there was still time. † Jack establishes his authority through brutality and force. He symbolises the savage and primitive part of human nature. His interactions with others more or less result in a display of rage and anger and he pitilessly forces the others to adhere to him. He orders the murder of Simon, the theft of Piggy’s glasses and even asks for Ralph’s life. Golding, through him examines, in depth the evil within man and the ugly part of the human mind. Another character that Golding uses to further examine the human race is that of Piggy. Through this â€Å"fat boy† the author shows rationality, reason, science and intelligence. Piggy along with his specs is the symbol of wisdom and provides an outlook into scientific man. Despite his intelligence, Piggy has his short comings; he has asthma and is a social outcast due to his superior intellect. He is fear full of Jack and even says, â€Å"We should fear each other†. His character gives the reader yet another example of a different type of human being, one who is above the rest intellectually but suffers from isolation and anxiety. Through him, Golding dives deeper into the psyche of a visionary. While Piggy, as a character does lend himself to the examination of human nature, his death too is a fine example of Golding’s thesis. When Piggy is killed by the stone which is rolled down we see no humanity left within these boys. We see only Ralph grieving the loss of a great friend, but everybody else especially Jack is oblivious. This shows us the common feeling of envy within man. All the boys were jealous of Piggy, his glasses and his intelligence. The Conch too shatters with Piggy which further accentuates the dilapidation of civilisation on the island, it also highlights man’s complete disregard for rules and his natural instinct to rebel. If Jack is part of darkest hues in the character palate, and Ralph can be painted in shades of grey, Simon resembles the purity of white. In Simon Golding explores the spiritual and innately good part of the human heart. Simon thinks only for the good of all, he practices meditation and sacrifices himself in an endeavour to save everybody. He is close to nature and is the only one who has a conversation with the sow. It is Simon, who understands the universal truth that it is not each other that we should fear nor I it some third person, but it is the evil within us that will eventually kill us all. It is rather unfortunate that this extraordinary, Christ-like figure is continually marginalised and is at the end murdered unfeelingly. In him Golding pictures the saint, the pure visionary who knows the truth. His character highlights the differently abled or the higher human nature, one which connects with God and Nature. With respect to Simon it is not only he who is a specimen to investigate human nature for Golding, but his interactions with the sow’s head and his death too focus on some other human traits. For example when he talks to the sow he displays a curtain of bravery which could be taken as the bravery of a martyr or the facade of a coward. His death however, according to me displays the most range of human emotions. The act itself shows primitive violence and carnal needs at its very roots. The reaction of the boys to the death is indifferent and they go on like nothing has happened, it shows that the different and often better people are always thrown away. It also shows the human habit of denial, where all the boys including Ralph completely deny any part in the killing. In the book, Simon is shown to be a true unsung martyr. The littluns in the book resemble the common man in society and his reflex reaction to conform, whereas the other bigguns resemble the followers and tails of the leaders. A biggun who distinctly stands out is Roger, he acts as second in command to Jack and it is he who is responsible for Piggy’s death. All the boys fight for power, they all want to control something. The sow shows the need for security, the Conch the superficial need for rules and the glasses the human need for technology. Through the novel, ‘Lord of the Flies’ Golding not only dives into the human mind, heart and soul by means of implication, but provides the reader with concrete examples and instances where the various facets of human nature are displayed. It is ironic that when â€Å"the beast† is killed by Jack the fire begins to destroy, and it is the fire, not one of hope but one of destruction that leads to the rescue of the boys. Through all these examples from the text I can without a doubt say that the novel is truly a fine example of an in-depth analysis of human nature. It makes a powerful impact on the reader and gives them food for thought. It makes us think of not only the various possibilities but also the extent to which the human mind and its essential evil nature can raise a storm and leave a pile of destruction behind.